Your Ad Here
22Magnum.com is for sale!
If you are interested in owning and developing this site further, contact me at zackp/@\carcentral[dot]com
PayDay loans car insurance

22 Magnum Ballistics Test (Remington Polymer Tip)

Posted: December 29th, 2011 | Author: zackpow | Filed under: 22 Magnum Pistol | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

This is probably a good *Rifle* round. I used a pistol, so it did not fragment as intended due to the lower velocities. It did exhibit cavitation and disruption at about 4 inches depth, and i assume the bullets started to tumble or yaw or spin or something after the polymer tips got blown out.

17 Comments on “22 Magnum Ballistics Test (Remington Polymer Tip)”

  1. 1 EliteAmericans said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    @Rbussiere50 me2?

  2. 2 Rbussiere50 said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    Yeah I? SHOOT EVERYTHING AT POINT BLAN RANGE

  3. 3 79Testo said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    “Winchester rapes you, you suck, get out of my face”
    lol?

  4. 4 79Testo said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    @EliteAmericans
    Americans have? british accents?
    lol
    bwhahahah

  5. 5 ntrudr800 said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    @jayrod68 But 22WMR IS AFFORDABLE! I get 50 rounds of 22WMR for less than 20 rounds of .308! 22LR is an inaccurate design! 22WMR & 17HMR are by design more accurate. I read that 17HMR was designed to be MATCH accurate in all its loadings. The 22LR case is as wide as the bullet! Oof! The 22WMR & 17HMR cases are? wider than their bullets. This alone proves they are better than .22LR. If you want to shoot cheaply, choose .22LR. And remember, 22WMR & 17HMR have further useful ranges than 22LR :D

  6. 6 Dro77080 said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    HAHAHAHA thats was funny? as fuck yo!

  7. 7 ClickBoom206 said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    @ 2:42 thats what she said lol, I? know I’m a dork for saying that dont worry you dont have to tell me how I fail at life ;P

  8. 8 phgHunter said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    Good? conclusion.

  9. 9 adamS0979 said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    lol?

  10. 10 derekgrebner87 said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    RAPE?

  11. 11 EliteAmericans said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    @Fookwah well, remington makes some decent guns. But this ammo pisses me off maybe if it was shot from a rifle it would perform decently.?

  12. 12 EliteAmericans said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    @Xxoo0o0o0ooxX hahaha thanks? man

  13. 13 Xxoo0o0o0ooxX said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    Nice video! LMFAO at the end :-)?

  14. 14 Fookwah said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    I say General, I don’t think I’d put up with that one bit, no! Not one bit! I motion that we chastise Remington immediately, and without mercy. We might go as far as sending them correspondence that say’s, “I do not care for you. Your bullets are overpriced shit!”? And draw a little picture of us riding behind the Winchester Logo in unashamed Brokeback fashion! That will convince them we’re not just putting them on!

  15. 15 EliteAmericans said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    @jayrod68 well the 17 hmr is a small bullet in a necked down 22? magnum case. and the 17 fireball is a smaller bullet in a necked down .22lr stinger case. The 17’s shoot flatter due to higher velocities or some stupid shit that doesn’t matter because jesus already made the .223.

  16. 16 jayrod68 said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    lol.? i want to know why sir why the fuck does .17 hmr and .17 fireball cost ass raping than .22lr almost double the fucking costs.

  17. 17 SupremeAmerican said at 12:02 pm on December 29th, 2011:

    lol?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.